Thank you Randall. I agree with everything you wrote. If J621 should not be political, but purely a matter of law, then why are the masterminds Trump, Stone and Bannon at large?
I would love to hear your legal take on how trump is even eligible for the office. He clearly participated in an insurrection based on at least two hearings/cases which confirmed that (the CO ballot case and the Jan 6th committee hearing) and I suspect Jack Smith's report will do the same. To my knowledge, no one is able to "waive" constitutional requirements, so how is trump able to get around the Sec3 of the 14th A? I know in the CO case, there was a comment about it " requiring executing legislation" which 1) is hitherto unknown made up conjecture and 2) merely dicta.
Thank you Randall. I agree with everything you wrote. If J621 should not be political, but purely a matter of law, then why are the masterminds Trump, Stone and Bannon at large?
I would love to hear your legal take on how trump is even eligible for the office. He clearly participated in an insurrection based on at least two hearings/cases which confirmed that (the CO ballot case and the Jan 6th committee hearing) and I suspect Jack Smith's report will do the same. To my knowledge, no one is able to "waive" constitutional requirements, so how is trump able to get around the Sec3 of the 14th A? I know in the CO case, there was a comment about it " requiring executing legislation" which 1) is hitherto unknown made up conjecture and 2) merely dicta.